Why this exists

The sgit.ai sites are written in the open by Dinis Cruz with teams of AI agents, and they move fast: the newsroom shipped 73 articles in eight weeks. The content is strong. The way a stranger gets into it often is not, because the people who build a site are the last people able to see it as a stranger does.

This site is where that gets written down. Publicly, because a failure stated in the open gets fixed, and because the patterns repeat: an unlabelled number, a filter you cannot share, a rating that starts preselected. Anyone building a site, ours or not, can use the principles and their one-minute tests.

Who writes it

Dinis Cruz, with AI co-authorship. Reviews are run by agents playing named roles (architect, librarian, historian, designer, editor, journalist) against measured evidence, and checked by a person. Findings come from those reviews and from anyone who uses the sites and tells us where they got stuck.

Disclosure

Every site reviewed here is ours. Browsers and platforms appear only where they get in the way of reading our sites, because readers blame the page for them either way, and each such finding names its real owner. The sgit.ai sites argue for sgit (encrypted git for humans and agents) and RiskMandate (behaviour policies for agents), and the author builds both. This site has an interest in those sites working, which is the reason it exists, and no interest in hiding where they do not.

What this is not

• Not a style guide. How code is written is coding.sgit.ai. This is what the reader experiences.
• Not a live monitor. Every status is dated. Nothing here claims to be current beyond the date it was checked.
• Not a scorecard of people. A finding is about a page and a reader, never about who built it.

Licences

Content CC BY 4.0: take it, adapt it, build on it, with attribution. Code Apache 2.0. The newsroom review quotes and measures newsroom.sgit.ai, which is also CC BY 4.0.